Hi
We're trying to hide certain localisations from the users in the frontend and ran into a problem and the eventual cause seems to be the ExternalLocalizationStore
service not deleting old localisations from the ExternalLocalizationStore
table. We found this out after we deployed a fix to our staging environment that removed a localization key value - however this did not get propagated to the database or the api/abp/application-localization
api, meaning we could see the value we wanted to removed in the response.
I have solved this by disabling the ExternalStore
feature and deleting the values from the AbpLocalizationTexts
database table however this isn't ideal as it means we no longer have the ability to edit the localizations using the Language Management UI (since our localisations are distributed across different webhosts).
There is a similar problem with the AbpLocalizationResources
table where the resource does not get removed if you delete it from the application altogether.
Steps:
-
Create a localization resource in your application with some
en.json
-
Run the host and ensure
AbpExternalLocalizationOptions
.SaveToExternalStore
is set totrue
in the host configuration. -
Observe the resource and the values from your
en.json
gets added to theAbpLocalizationTexts
table -
Remove several keys from the
en.json
file -
Rerun the host (ensure db is kept online to simulate prod/stg environment).
-
Observe the entry in
AbpLocalizationTexts
table still shows the keys you have just deleted. -
This can also be checked by looking at the LanguageManagement UI and seeing the value there still.
I have cleared redis to ensure I'm not seeing old cached values and I can see they get repopulated upon page refresh so it isn't this.
If this is the intended behaviour and just requires manual patching each time we make changes to the .json
files it is disappointing as it adds additional overhead to deployments.
Is there a fix for this that deletes older keys from the db to ensure only the latest is shown to the users? We are using ABP commercial 7.3.3.
Thank you ! :)
8 Answer(s)
-
0
hi
I will check this case.
Thanks.
-
0
hi
Please send an email to liming.ma@volosoft.com
I will share the latest
ExternalLocalizationSaver
with you. then you can use it to override the default one(IExternalLocalizationSaver
).Thanks.
-
0
Thanks Maliming.
I can see this implements the option to delete old resources however the deleted text records in a resource dont get removed from the db still. Is this something that is being added?
Thanks. -
0
hi
These code will remove the text records
-
0
Thanks Maliming. I see the issue I had when I QA'ed this which is why I thought they didn't get deleted. I think it might be something wrong with the way the hash of the text records caching is created.
My steps were:
-
Run a version of our application where we add a new localization resource with text records
-
Run our application with changes to the text records localization resource.
-
Run our application with the new
ExternalLocalizationSaver
code in it.
When I run step 2, there are changes to the localization resource so the hashes of the db versus the
.json
file are different so it doesn't exit early from theUpdateResourceTextChangesAsync
method. However, because I'm using an older version of theExternalLocalizationSaver
, the localizations in the db field do not get deleted. The hash for the resource gets updated into the cache, using the hash calculated from thelocalizedStrings
- the raw.json
text records.
When I run step 3 with the newExternalLocalizationSaver
, it exits early because the hashes are the same. This means it doesn't delete the old text records from the db field.I've fixed this by clearing the cache between steps 2 and 3 which ensures it does not return early from the
UpdateResourceTextChangesAsync
method.A fix on your side could be regenerating the hash that is to be stored in the cache at the end of the method from the
textsInDatabase
to ensure it captures any existing texts records stored in the db. -
-
0
ok, is the issue solved?
-
0
Yes I think so more or less, but I would suggest this fix could improve + reduce issues like this in the future.
A fix on your side could be regenerating the hash that is to be stored in the cache at the end of the method from the textsInDatabase to ensure it captures any existing texts records stored in the db.
-
0
Thanks. I will check it.